This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Which is more evident: potential or kinetic energy? A) Potential energy is more evident than ... (Read 75 times)

jazziefee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 505
Which is more evident: potential or kinetic energy?
 
  A) Potential energy is more evident than kinetic energy because it required work in order to gain that potential energy.
  B) Potential energy is more evident than kinetic energy because it involves motion.
  C) Kinetic energy is more evident than potential energy because it is created from potential energy.
  D) Kinetic energy is more evident than potential energy because it involves motion.

Question 2

What property of nitrocellulose was exploited in the early production of the photography and movie industry?
 
  A) It could be molded and rolled into thin, transparent films.
  B) It could be dissolved easily.
  C) It would leave very little ash when burnt.
  D) It is extremely light sensitive and darkens upon exposure to light.
  E) all of the above



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

uniquea123

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 311
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

A




jazziefee

  • Member
  • Posts: 505
Reply 2 on: Aug 27, 2018
:D TYSM


jomama

  • Member
  • Posts: 346
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Gracias!

 

Did you know?

Alzheimer's disease affects only about 10% of people older than 65 years of age. Most forms of decreased mental function and dementia are caused by disuse (letting the mind get lazy).

Did you know?

Women are 50% to 75% more likely than men to experience an adverse drug reaction.

Did you know?

The eye muscles are the most active muscles in the whole body. The external muscles that move the eyes are the strongest muscles in the human body for the job they have to do. They are 100 times more powerful than they need to be.

Did you know?

Alcohol acts as a diuretic. Eight ounces of water is needed to metabolize just 1 ounce of alcohol.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library