This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In Near v. Minnesota, the Supreme Court A) ruled that prior restraint is a political issue and ... (Read 84 times)

appyboo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
In Near v. Minnesota, the Supreme Court
 
  A) ruled that prior restraint is a political issue and therefore not justifiable.
  B) ruled that prior restraint is not a violation of freedom of the press.
  C) ruled that prior restraint almost always places an unacceptable burden on a free press.
  D) ruled that prior restraint of the press is permitted by the clear and present danger test.
  E) applied a three-pronged test to identify whether prior restraint is permissible.

Question 2

In the 1970s, Daniel Ellsberg stole classified documents that came to be known as the __________ and gave them to national newspapers.
 
  A) Vietnam Plans
  B) Nixon Scheme
  C) Pentagon Papers
  D) Watergate Files
  E) Snowden Report



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

blakcmamba

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 335
Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

C





 

Did you know?

To prove that stomach ulcers were caused by bacteria and not by stress, a researcher consumed an entire laboratory beaker full of bacterial culture. After this, he did indeed develop stomach ulcers, and won the Nobel Prize for his discovery.

Did you know?

Normal urine is sterile. It contains fluids, salts, and waste products. It is free of bacteria, viruses, and fungi.

Did you know?

Famous people who died from poisoning or drug overdose include, Adolf Hitler, Socrates, Juan Ponce de Leon, Marilyn Monroe, Judy Garland, and John Belushi.

Did you know?

Sildenafil (Viagra®) has two actions that may be of consequence in patients with heart disease. It can lower the blood pressure, and it can interact with nitrates. It should never be used in patients who are taking nitrates.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library