Author Question: In 1972, the United Nations General Assembly convened the first UN Conference on the Human ... (Read 111 times)

ss2343

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 548
In 1972, the United Nations General Assembly convened the first UN Conference on the Human Environment in Stockholm. During the ensuing years, other conferences were held. (a) What factors mitigate against international cooperation to solve global ecological problems? (b) What are the prospects for achieving sustainable development through a managed global commons arrangement?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

NeoMalthusians and cornucopians are the labels given to different schools of thought about the impact of population growth on economic development and environmental quality. Write an essay in which you contrast the positions taken by these two schools on the demographic future of the human species. Based on the available evidence on current population and resource trends, which school of thought do you find more convincing? Why?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Beatricemm

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 323
Answer to Question 1

Theorists adhering to realism and free-market mercantilism resolutely defend freedom
of economic choice without regulation as the best path to realizing the greatest good
for the greatest number. Theorists from these traditions believe that pursuing selfinterest and personal profit will benefit all in the long run, producing more income and
technological innovation than would otherwise occur under supervisory regulation of
corporations, entrepreneurs, and investors. They also feel that minimal interference in
the pursuit of personal gain is helpful to the preservation of the Earth's environment.
According to their reasoning, the pursuit of private gain with little restraint is a virtue,
not a vice.

Answer to Question 2

Global environmental issues engage the competing perspectives of optimistic
cornucopians and pessimistic neo-Malthusians. Cornucopians adhere to the belief
that if free markets and free trade prevail, ecological imbalances that threaten
humanity will eventually be corrected. For them, prices are the key adjustment
mechanism that ultimately produces the greatest good for the greatest number of
people. Neo-Malthusians, on the other hand, have a lot in common with economic
mercantilism, which argues that free markets fail to prevent excessive resource
exploitation and that, accordingly, intervention by governing institutions is necessary.
This latter perspective rejects the belief that the free market will always maximize
social welfare.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

According to the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, lung disease is the third leading killer in the United States, responsible for one in seven deaths. It is the leading cause of death among infants under the age of one year.

Did you know?

Blood in the urine can be a sign of a kidney stone, glomerulonephritis, or other kidney problems.

Did you know?

Vaccines prevent between 2.5 and 4 million deaths every year.

Did you know?

A headache when you wake up in the morning is indicative of sinusitis. Other symptoms of sinusitis can include fever, weakness, tiredness, a cough that may be more severe at night, and a runny nose or nasal congestion.

Did you know?

In women, pharmacodynamic differences include increased sensitivity to (and increased effectiveness of) beta-blockers, opioids, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and typical antipsychotics.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library