Your textbook mentions that diplomats can only be successful if ...

[lidoalex]

Your textbook mentions that diplomats can only be successful if they have the support and backing of the governments they represent. (a) How could disagreement and dispute at the domestic level affect a diplomat's ability to negotiate? (b) How might these constraints affect diplomats from democratic governments differently than those from autocracies?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

What are the conditions that must be met in order for a war to be considered just?Based on these criteria, was the 2003 war that the United States waged against Iraq just? How does terrorism affect attempting to wage jus ad bellum? How about jus in bello?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

[maya.nigrin17@yahoo.com]

Answer to Question 1

Negotiation is the diplomatic dialogue and discussion between two or more parties
with the goal of resolving, through give-and-take bargaining, perceived differences of
interests and the conflicts they cause.

Answer to Question 2

Just war doctrine is the moral criteria identifying when a just war may be undertaken
and how it should be fought once it begins. Jus ad bellum is a component of just war
doctrine that establishes criteria under which a just war may be initiated. Jus in bello
is a component of just war doctrine that sets limits on the acceptable use of force.

[lidoalex]

Both answers were spot on, thank you once again

[maya.nigrin17@yahoo.com]

Great! Please up vote