Liberal and constructivist theorists often look to the rules, ...

[jho37]

Liberal and constructivist theorists often look to the rules, norms, and institutions in the international system as an explanation for war and peace.
 
  a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

Military power is an important characteristic of states from a realist point of view, but states that are apparently weak seem to win a large share of armed conflicts. (a) How can we change our definition of military power to reflect this reality? (b) Are there other types of power that may be more important in predicting military victories? (c) Should states focus primarily on military power in their security decisions? Why?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

[bookworm410]

Answer to Question 1

True

Answer to Question 2

Of all the components of state power, realists see military capability as by far the most
important. Realist theory maintains that the ability to coerce militarily is more important
than rewarding favors or buying concessions. Thus, realists reject the view of liberal
strategic thinkers who maintain that under conditions of globalization, which links
countries economically, politically, and culturally in webs of interdependence, economic
resources are becoming increasingly more critical to national strength and security than
are military capabilities. Following tradition, one way to estimate the power potential
of states is to compare their military expenditures.

[jho37]

Wow, this really help

[peter]

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it