This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: A probable reason why the Abecedarian Project had stronger positive effects than Head Start is that ... (Read 66 times)

big1devin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 583
A probable reason why the Abecedarian Project had stronger positive effects than Head Start is that it had
 
  a. many years as a federally-funded project, which gave time for improvement.
   b. an intensive design with many hours of intervention combined with home visits.
   c. a curriculum that emphasized standardized tests.
 
   d. more teachers of color involved.

Question 2

Compared to control groups, longitudinal studies of the effectiveness of Head Start have shown that Head Start students
 
  a. showed more learning disabilities.
 
   b. showed modest cognitive gains.
 
   c. showed large cognitive gains.
 
   d. had lowered occupational aspirations while in high school.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Mollythedog

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 340
Answer to Question 1

ANSWER: b

Answer to Question 2

ANSWER: b




big1devin

  • Member
  • Posts: 583
Reply 2 on: Sep 15, 2018
Gracias!


ryhom

  • Member
  • Posts: 366
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

 

Did you know?

About 600,000 particles of skin are shed every hour by each human. If you live to age 70 years, you have shed 105 pounds of dead skin.

Did you know?

Medication errors are three times higher among children and infants than with adults.

Did you know?

The National Institutes of Health have supported research into acupuncture. This has shown that acupuncture significantly reduced pain associated with osteoarthritis of the knee, when used as a complement to conventional therapies.

Did you know?

The average human gut is home to perhaps 500 to 1,000 different species of bacteria.

Did you know?

The ratio of hydrogen atoms to oxygen in water (H2O) is 2:1.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library