Proponents of income redistribution argue that redistribution

[bucstennis@aim.com]

Question 1

Opponents of income redistribution argue that

◦ redistribution violates the proposition that "one is entitled to the fruits of one's efforts."
◦ property income is less just than labor income and thus redistribution of that income is justified.
◦ redistribution encourages too much competition.
◦ Both redistribution violates the proposition that "one is entitled to the fruits of one's efforts." and redistribution encourages too much competition are correct.

Question 2

Proponents of income redistribution argue that redistribution

◦ increases the welfare of all members of society.
◦ will not take place absent government intervention as the market for charity, a private good, is imperfect.
◦ would be agreed to by all members of society if they were risk-loving and contracting from the "original position."
◦ helps those who, through no fault of their own, are unable to earn an adequate income.

[cclemon1]

A FREE account is required to view all solutions! Click to Register

Login with Facebook Login with Google Login with Email

Lorsum iprem. Lorsus sur ipci. Lorsem sur iprem. Lorsum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipci. Lorsum sur iprium, valum sur ipci et, vala sur ipci. Lorsem sur ipci, lorsa sur iprem. Valus sur ipdi. Lorsus sur iprium nunc, valem sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsum sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Vala sur ipdi nunc, valem sur ipdi, valum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipdi, vala sur ipdi. Valem sur iprem nunc, lorsa sur iprium. Valum sur ipdi et, lorsus sur ipci. Valem sur iprem. Valem sur ipci. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsem sur ipci, valus sur iprem. Lorsem sur iprem nunc, valus sur iprium.

Answer Preview

Only 58% of students answer this correctly

[Sydney Wheeler]

Thank you