A researcher tests out a classroom intervention to enhance children's social interaction. Some children receive the intervention, whereas others do not. The researcher counts the positive interactions between children across a period of two years. Children who received the intervention are found to be more positive in these interactions. Which one of the following conclusions is most justified?
◦ Because the intervention caused children to interact positively with peers, this method should be adopted by the entire school district.
◦ The intervention may have caused children to interact positively. However, other factors - such as parent involvement in the study - may also explain the difference in behavior.
◦ Because only some children received the intervention, we can't draw any conclusions about its effectiveness for children in general.
◦ Two variables - the intervention and social interaction - are related. There is no basis for speculating that one has caused the other.
Epiphyseal Usually occurs through the growth plate where the matrix is undergoing calcification and
Procedures for Diagnostic Tests Related to the Digestive System
Categories of CLIA Tests
Economic and Social Development
Calorie Needs for Children and Adolescents
Immunizing young children against a variety of diseases