A company claims to have invented a hand-held sensor that can detect the presence of explosives inside a closed container. Law enforcement and security agencies are very interested in purchasing several of the devices if they are shown to perform effectively. An independent laboratory arranged a preliminary test. If the device can detect explosives at a rate greater than chance would predict, a more rigorous test will be performed. They placed four empty boxes in the corners of an otherwise empty room. For each trial they put a small quantity of an explosive in one of the boxes selected at random. The company's technician then entered the room and used the sensor to try to determine which of the four boxes contained the explosive. The experiment consisted of 50 trials, and the technician was successful in finding the explosive 16 times. Does this indicate that the device is effective in sensing the presence of explosives, and should undergo more rigorous testing?
Was your test one-tail upper tail, lower tail, or two-tail? Explain why you chose that kind of test in this situation.
PCR primers detect and amplify a specific genomic region
Stair well hand rail culture
Facing the table, place one hand on the thigh and the other on the lower leg. Gently rock the leg ...
Finish by holding the hand briefly.
Six-week embryo showing development of hand and foot plates
Sketch a graph of the function h(x), by hand on the following interval: