Sanders Sporting Goods, an international sporting goods chain, is ...

[robinn137]

Sanders Sporting Goods, an international sporting goods chain, is being sued for sexual harassment by a former Sanders employee. The plaintiff asserts that she was the victim of numerous unwanted sexual advances from a male co-worker. The woman claims that Sanders' management condoned a hostile work environment and that the company is liable for the actions of the male employee.

Which of the following, if TRUE, would most likely undermine the plaintiff's claim that Sanders is liable for the male employee's conduct?
◦ The male employee was required by HR to participate in a sexual harassment awareness course.
◦ The male employee physically threatened the plaintiff on three occasions.
◦ The plaintiff discussed her concerns about the male employee's conduct with female co-workers.
◦ The male employee made sexual advances towards the plaintiff on a daily basis.

[kaylee05]

A FREE account is required to view all solutions! Click to Register

Login with Facebook Login with Google Login with Email

Lorsum iprem. Lorsus sur ipci. Lorsem sur iprem. Lorsum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipci. Lorsum sur iprium, valum sur ipci et, vala sur ipci. Lorsem sur ipci, lorsa sur iprem. Valus sur ipdi. Lorsus sur iprium nunc, valem sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsum sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Vala sur ipdi nunc, valem sur ipdi, valum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipdi, vala sur ipdi. Valem sur iprem nunc, lorsa sur iprium. Valum sur ipdi et, lorsus sur ipci. Valem sur iprem. Valem sur ipci. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsem sur ipci, valus sur iprem. Lorsem sur iprem nunc, valus sur iprium.

Answer Preview

Only 50% of students answer this correctly

[robinn137]

Thank you!

[kaylee05]

Always glad to help...