Author Question: A product has the following gross requirements. Which is cheaper, lot-for-lot or EOQ ... (Read 62 times)

NClaborn · **on:** Dec 3, 2019

Question 1

A product has the following gross requirements. Which is cheaper lot-for-lot, part period balance, or EOQ lot sizing?

Week	1	2	3	4	5	6
Requirements	50	80	90	50	30	60

Other data for this scenario include: setup cost = $250, inventory holding cost $2 per unit per week. There is no beginning inventory; there are no scheduled receipts. The usage pattern is expected to continue for the remainder of the year.

Question 2

A product has the following gross requirements. Which is cheaper, lot-for-lot or EOQ lot-sizing?

Week	1	2	3	4
Requirements	50	30	40	80

Other data for this scenario include: setup cost = $1000, inventory holding cost $1 per unit per week. There is no beginning inventory; there are no scheduled receipts. The usage pattern is expected to continue for the remainder of the year.

mceravolo · **Reply #1 on:** Dec 3, 2019

A FREE account is required to view all solutions!

Lorsum iprem. Lorsus sur ipci. Lorsem sur iprem. Lorsum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipci. Lorsum sur iprium, valum sur ipci et, vala sur ipci. Lorsem sur ipci, lorsa sur iprem. Valus sur ipdi. Lorsus sur iprium nunc, valem sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsum sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Vala sur ipdi nunc, valem sur ipdi, valum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipdi, vala sur ipdi. Valem sur iprem nunc, lorsa sur iprium. Valum sur ipdi et, lorsus sur ipci. Valem sur iprem. Valem sur ipci. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsem sur ipci, valus sur iprem. Lorsem sur iprem nunc, valus sur iprium.

Answer Preview

Only 25% of students answer this correctly