This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Psychologists have found that people are generally reluctant to transmit bad news to their peers. ... (Read 54 times)

roselinechinyere27m

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
Psychologists have found that people are generally reluctant to transmit bad news to their peers. This phenomenon has been named the "MUM effect." To investigate the cause of the MUM effect, 40 undergraduates at a certain university participated in an experiment. Each subject was asked to administer an IQ test to another student and then provide the test taker with his or her percentile score. (Unknown to the subject, the test taker was a bogus student who was working with the researchers.) The experimenters manipulated two factors, subject visibility and success of test taker, each at two levels. Subject visibility was either visible or not visible to the test taker. Success of test taker was either top 20% or bottom 20%. Ten subjects were randomly assigned to each of the 2 x 2 = 4 experimental conditions, then the time (in seconds) between the end of the test and the delivery of the percentile score from the subject to the test taker was measured. (This variable is called the latency to feedback.) The data was subject to an analysis of variance, with the following results:

SourcedfSSMSFPR > F
___________________________________________________________________
Subject visibility11380.24​1380.24​4.25​0.430
Test taker success11325.16​1325.16​4.10​0.05
Visibility x success13385.803385.8010.45.002
Error3611,664.00324.00
___________________________________________________________________
Total3917,755.20

Which conclusion can you draw from the analysis? Use α = .01.
◦ At α = .01, neither subject visibility nor test taker success are important predictors of latency to feedback.
◦ At α = .01, the model is not useful for predicting latency to feedback.
◦ At α = .01, there is sufficient evidence to indicate that subject visibility and test taker success interact.
◦ At α = .01, there is no evidence of interaction between subject visibility and test taker success.


Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by roselinechinyere27m on Feb 14, 2020

nikmaaacs

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 335
Lorsum iprem. Lorsus sur ipci. Lorsem sur iprem. Lorsum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipci. Lorsum sur iprium, valum sur ipci et, vala sur ipci. Lorsem sur ipci, lorsa sur iprem. Valus sur ipdi. Lorsus sur iprium nunc, valem sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsum sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Vala sur ipdi nunc, valem sur ipdi, valum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipdi, vala sur ipdi. Valem sur iprem nunc, lorsa sur iprium. Valum sur ipdi et, lorsus sur ipci. Valem sur iprem. Valem sur ipci. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsem sur ipci, valus sur iprem. Lorsem sur iprem nunc, valus sur iprium.
Answer Preview
Only 58% of students answer this correctly




roselinechinyere27m

  • Member
  • Posts: 557
Reply 2 on: Feb 14, 2020
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review


connor417

  • Member
  • Posts: 329
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

There are 20 feet of blood vessels in each square inch of human skin.

Did you know?

People who have myopia, or nearsightedness, are not able to see objects at a distance but only up close. It occurs when the cornea is either curved too steeply, the eye is too long, or both. This condition is progressive and worsens with time. More than 100 million people in the United States are nearsighted, but only 20% of those are born with the condition. Diet, eye exercise, drug therapy, and corrective lenses can all help manage nearsightedness.

Did you know?

Limit intake of red meat and dairy products made with whole milk. Choose skim milk, low-fat or fat-free dairy products. Limit fried food. Use healthy oils when cooking.

Did you know?

There are 60,000 miles of blood vessels in every adult human.

Did you know?

The first monoclonal antibodies were made exclusively from mouse cells. Some are now fully human, which means they are likely to be safer and may be more effective than older monoclonal antibodies.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library