Author Question: Discuss the three factors that slowed the acceptance of lithium in the U.S. What will be an ideal ... (Read 28 times)

Lisaclaire

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 569
Discuss the three factors that slowed the acceptance of lithium in the U.S.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Explain the arguments for and against prescriptive licensing for psychologists.
 
  What will be an ideal response?



aidanmbrowne

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 305
Answer to Question 1

First, was an incident involving lithium chloride as a sodium chloride substitute for heart patients. Above a certain level, lithium is toxic and, because there was no dose limit, many users became ill and several died. Lithium then had a bad reputation as potentially lethal. Second, mania was not seen as a major problem in the U.S. The behavior of mania is rarely the kind in which people would seek treatment. Patients who would become quite manic and lose touch with reality would have been called schizophrenic at that time, and antipsychotics are usually effective in controlling mania. The third reason deals with economics and the problem with drug introduction in the U.S. A company that wants to sell a drug must spend a great deal of money to demonstrate safety and effectiveness to the FDA. Because lithium is one of the basic chemical elements and its simple salts had been available for many years, it would have been impossible to receive a patent making it easy for others to sell the drug after approval. Therefore, the company could not have recouped expenses.

Answer to Question 2

Argument for: There is a general shortage of psychiatrists especially in rural and low-income urban areas. People are then usually prescribed psychoactive drugs by a general practitioner and may be seeing a psychologist. There is often little communication between the two, so patients could be receiving incorrect treatment. General medical training covers very little about mental illness and clinical psychology training is extensive on mental illness but no background in medicine. If psychologists could undergo more training in medicine and prescription of medicine, they could be well equipped to give drug treatment to patients.
Argument against: Medical doctors fear that even with this training psychologists could still miss important medical considerations and, therefore, put a patient's health at risk. Some psychologists fear that this could turn the field of psychology into pill pushing and neglect the other treatment approaches.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

Cocaine was isolated in 1860 and first used as a local anesthetic in 1884. Its first clinical use was by Sigmund Freud to wean a patient from morphine addiction. The fictional character Sherlock Holmes was supposed to be addicted to cocaine by injection.

Did you know?

When blood is exposed to air, it clots. Heparin allows the blood to come in direct contact with air without clotting.

Did you know?

Parkinson's disease is both chronic and progressive. This means that it persists over a long period of time and that its symptoms grow worse over time.

Did you know?

Adolescents often feel clumsy during puberty because during this time of development, their hands and feet grow faster than their arms and legs do. The body is therefore out of proportion. One out of five adolescents actually experiences growing pains during this period.

Did you know?

Patients who have been on total parenteral nutrition for more than a few days may need to have foods gradually reintroduced to give the digestive tract time to start working again.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library