Author Question: In a high-risk situation (e.g., a gang drive-by shooting), the Supreme Court has upheld the police: (Read 42 times)

Lisaclaire · **on:** Apr 23, 2020

Question 1

In Illinois v. Wardlow, the Supreme Court decided that a citizen's running away from the police:
◦ may never be searched.
◦ may be searched under certain conditions.
◦ may be killed, under today's fleeing-felon rule.
◦ may only be searched with the citizen's consent.

Question 2

In a high-risk situation (e.g., a gang drive-by shooting), the Supreme Court has upheld the police:
◦ handcuffing a home's occupants and detaining them for several hours while searching the
premises for evidence.
◦ issuing a search warrant themselves, while standing somewhere in the suspect's yard.
◦ using text messaging to contact a judge directly, for permission to enter.
◦ firing a warning shot into a wall before entering the suspect's home.

cadimas · **Reply #1 on:** Apr 23, 2020

A FREE account is required to view all solutions!

Lorsum iprem. Lorsus sur ipci. Lorsem sur iprem. Lorsum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipci. Lorsum sur iprium, valum sur ipci et, vala sur ipci. Lorsem sur ipci, lorsa sur iprem. Valus sur ipdi. Lorsus sur iprium nunc, valem sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsum sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Vala sur ipdi nunc, valem sur ipdi, valum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipdi, vala sur ipdi. Valem sur iprem nunc, lorsa sur iprium. Valum sur ipdi et, lorsus sur ipci. Valem sur iprem. Valem sur ipci. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsem sur ipci, valus sur iprem. Lorsem sur iprem nunc, valus sur iprium.

Answer Preview

Only 56% of students answer this correctly