Author Question: Mr. Buyer, the plaintiff in the action, was attempting to enforce a contract in which the defendant, ... (Read 191 times)

FButt · **on:** Aug 7, 2021

Mr. Buyer, the plaintiff in the action, was attempting to enforce a contract in which the defendant, Mr. Seller, agreed to sell to the buyer his property, Blackacre, for $100 000. Which of the following, by itself, would be sufficient to allow Mr. Seller to get out of the contract?
◦ Mr. Buyer referred to essential terms in a letter sent to Mr. Seller.
◦ Although both parties agreed to this, no money had actually been paid on the contract, not even a deposit or a down payment.
◦ The $10 000 was not enough (i.e., not fair).
◦ There was only a verbal agreement between Mr. Seller and Mr. Buyer.
◦ At the time of the contract, unknown to Mr. Buyer, Mr. Seller did not understand the quality and nature of this act because of mental incapacity.

janeli1 · **Reply #1 on:** Aug 7, 2021

A FREE account is required to view all solutions!

Lorsum iprem. Lorsus sur ipci. Lorsem sur iprem. Lorsum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipci. Lorsum sur iprium, valum sur ipci et, vala sur ipci. Lorsem sur ipci, lorsa sur iprem. Valus sur ipdi. Lorsus sur iprium nunc, valem sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsum sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Vala sur ipdi nunc, valem sur ipdi, valum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipdi, vala sur ipdi. Valem sur iprem nunc, lorsa sur iprium. Valum sur ipdi et, lorsus sur ipci. Valem sur iprem. Valem sur ipci. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsem sur ipci, valus sur iprem. Lorsem sur iprem nunc, valus sur iprium.

Answer Preview

Only 64% of students answer this correctly