Author Question: Which of the following will have the likely consequence of the court finding the contract void on ... (Read 34 times)

lak · **on:** Aug 7, 2021

Which of the following will have the likely consequence of the court finding the contract void on the grounds of mistake?
◦ Mr. Ille (a blind man), although using due care, signed a cheque for $100 in favour of his caretaker, who had told him it was a receipt for money received.
◦ Mr. Twigg carelessly signed a mortgage for $24 000, which he was told was a mortgage for only $14 000. This was assigned to Mr. Jones.
◦ Mr. Ideer bought some property, erroneously thinking that the province was planning to put a highway nearby, even though the seller had never made any such suggestion.
◦ Mr. Jones, without reliance on a salesperson, purchased an Android table from a store, thinking it ran the Apple iOS.
◦ The parties signed a document that stated the consideration as $1200 instead of the $1100 that the buyer and seller had contracted for, but the buyer cannot prove the terms of the original contract.

vickybb89 · **Reply #1 on:** Aug 7, 2021

A FREE account is required to view all solutions!

Lorsum iprem. Lorsus sur ipci. Lorsem sur iprem. Lorsum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipci. Lorsum sur iprium, valum sur ipci et, vala sur ipci. Lorsem sur ipci, lorsa sur iprem. Valus sur ipdi. Lorsus sur iprium nunc, valem sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsum sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Vala sur ipdi nunc, valem sur ipdi, valum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipdi, vala sur ipdi. Valem sur iprem nunc, lorsa sur iprium. Valum sur ipdi et, lorsus sur ipci. Valem sur iprem. Valem sur ipci. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsem sur ipci, valus sur iprem. Lorsem sur iprem nunc, valus sur iprium.

Answer Preview

Only 39% of students answer this correctly