Author Question: John had worked for his employer for 15 years when he was terminated without notice or pay in lieu ... (Read 115 times)

karlynnae · **on:** Aug 7, 2021

John had worked for his employer for 15 years when he was terminated without notice or pay in lieu of notice. He filed a lawsuit for wrongful dismissal as he felt there was no just cause for the termination, although he did believe there had been a plot to get rid of him. Which of the following is correct?
◦ John should have filed his lawsuit as a case of constructive dismissal in order to win punitive and aggravated damages.
◦ In the absence of just cause, John would likely be entitled to reasonable pay in lieu of notice and punitive damages as he was fired without just cause.
◦ In the absence of just cause, John would likely be entitled to reasonable pay in lieu of notice and punitive damages due to the employer's malicious and outrageous act.
◦ In the absence of just cause, John would likely be entitled to reasonable pay in lieu of notice, but no punitive damages unless the employer had committed some tort related to John.
◦ Even if there was no just cause, John likely would not be entitled to any compensation as he did not suffer actual psychological harm as a result of losing his job.

heyhey123 · **Reply #1 on:** Aug 7, 2021

A FREE account is required to view all solutions!

Lorsum iprem. Lorsus sur ipci. Lorsem sur iprem. Lorsum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipci. Lorsum sur iprium, valum sur ipci et, vala sur ipci. Lorsem sur ipci, lorsa sur iprem. Valus sur ipdi. Lorsus sur iprium nunc, valem sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsum sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Vala sur ipdi nunc, valem sur ipdi, valum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipdi, vala sur ipdi. Valem sur iprem nunc, lorsa sur iprium. Valum sur ipdi et, lorsus sur ipci. Valem sur iprem. Valem sur ipci. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsem sur ipci, valus sur iprem. Lorsem sur iprem nunc, valus sur iprium.

Answer Preview

Only 30% of students answer this correctly