Mabel was employed as a waitress at a respectable restaurant in ...

[anjilletteb]

Mabel was employed as a waitress at a respectable restaurant in Vancouver. After cleaning up one of the tables, she noticed a valuable brooch on the floor beneath the table. Which of the following is correct with respect to her legal claim to the brooch?
◦ Because of the principle of "finders keepers," Mabel gets to keep the brooch even against the original owners who lost it.
◦ Although Mabel found the brooch in a public part of the restaurant, she must give the brooch to her employer, who has the right to keep it if the rightful owner is not found.
◦ As the finder of the brooch, Mabel is entitled to it. She has a prior claim against all but the rightful owner of the brooch.
◦ Mabel has no claim to the brooch no matter where she found it.
◦ Mabel must hand the brooch to the police, and if the rightful owner does not come forward, the brooch becomes the property of the government.

[yasmin]

A FREE account is required to view all solutions! Click to Register

Login with Facebook Login with Google Login with Email

Lorsum iprem. Lorsus sur ipci. Lorsem sur iprem. Lorsum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipci. Lorsum sur iprium, valum sur ipci et, vala sur ipci. Lorsem sur ipci, lorsa sur iprem. Valus sur ipdi. Lorsus sur iprium nunc, valem sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsum sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Vala sur ipdi nunc, valem sur ipdi, valum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipdi, vala sur ipdi. Valem sur iprem nunc, lorsa sur iprium. Valum sur ipdi et, lorsus sur ipci. Valem sur iprem. Valem sur ipci. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsem sur ipci, valus sur iprem. Lorsem sur iprem nunc, valus sur iprium.

Answer Preview

Only 64% of students answer this correctly

[anjilletteb]

TYSM

[JCABRERA33]

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it