Author Question: Recent meta-analyses of prevention programs indicate that these programs continue to be effective, ... (Read 133 times)

ec501234

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 573
Recent meta-analyses of prevention programs indicate that these programs continue to be effective, but that they need to:
 
  a. be culturally sensitive
  b. be implemented with careful attention to quality
  c. involve peers, parents, schools, communities
  d. all of the above

Question 2

Meta-analyses of primary and secondary prevention programs indicated that these programs were:
 
  a. effective in reducing problems or increasing competencies.
  b. NOT effective in reducing problems or increasing competencies.
  c. effective in changing attitudes, but not behaviors.
  d. both b' and c'



phuda

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 348
Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

a



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Malaria mortality rates are falling. Increased malaria prevention and control measures have greatly improved these rates. Since 2000, malaria mortality rates have fallen globally by 60% among all age groups, and by 65% among children under age 5.

Did you know?

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was originally known as the Communicable Disease Center, which was formed to fight malaria. It was originally headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, since the Southern states faced the worst threat from malaria.

Did you know?

The term bacteria was devised in the 19th century by German biologist Ferdinand Cohn. He based it on the Greek word "bakterion" meaning a small rod or staff. Cohn is considered to be the father of modern bacteriology.

Did you know?

Only one in 10 cancer deaths is caused by the primary tumor. The vast majority of cancer mortality is caused by cells breaking away from the main tumor and metastasizing to other parts of the body, such as the brain, bones, or liver.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library