Saul is a prospective juror in a mass murder case who, when asked by an attorney, says that he opposes the death penalty. The presiding judge then excludes him from the jury. This is an example of
a. leniency bias.
b. death qualification.
c. scientific jury selection.
d. jury nullification.
Question 2
Imagine a person high in implicit prejudice having to interact with a person of a different race in a laboratory setting over several meetings. Research by Page-Gould and others (2008) suggests that for this individual, cortical levels will
a. be highest at the first meeting and decrease over time.
b. be lowest at the first meeting and increase over time.
c. remain level across all meetings.
d. wax and wane over the course of all meetings.
The recent mass upheavals in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Yemen, and Syria gave political scientists a cha
Durable power of attorney.
The violation of mores is a serious matter. In this case, it is serious enough that security at an ...
This Russian godfather is leaving a Moscow court just after he was acquitted of a double murder. Do ...
This five-wire mass air flow sensor consists of a metal foil sensing unit, an intake air temperature ...
Planet Z-34 has a mass equal to 1/3 that of Earth, a radius equal to 1/3 that of Earth, and an ...