This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: How do emotions, social relations, and goals influence happiness? What will be an ideal ... (Read 11 times)

sammy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 818
How do emotions, social relations, and goals influence happiness?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

What are two social psychological effects that contribute to the difficulties jurors have in ignoring information they have been exposed to, such as a suspect's prior convictions and acquittals?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Cheesycrackers

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 333
Answer to Question 1

First, happy people report a higher frequency of positive emotions and a lower frequency of negative emotions than people who are less happy. A higher frequency of positive emotions leads people to think and act in ways that help to broaden and build their emotional, physical, and social resources. Second, good social relations with other peoplefriends, family, romantic partnersis an important ingredient for being happy. Such close relationships are available to all people, regardless of personal wealth. Finally, many studies indicate that people who have concrete goals, especially realistic ones, and who feel they are making progress toward those goals, are happier than people who lack goals.

Answer to Question 2

One contributing factor is the concept of belief perseverance. This is the tendency to adhere to our beliefs or attitudes, even when new evidence indicates inaccuracies. So, if new evidence comes to light regarding a suspect, any previous information that a juror has heard, even if it has no bearing on the current case, may contribute to a juror's view of the current case. A second contributing factor is the hindsight bias, which is the tendency to believe that I knew it all along when an event occurs or new information is received that is consistent with the conclusion reached. So, when evidence is presented that jurors are not supposed to remember and use, they may later assume they knew the information before it was presented in court and actually be influenced by it.




sammy

  • Member
  • Posts: 818
Reply 2 on: Jun 22, 2018
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review


Zebsrer

  • Member
  • Posts: 284
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

It is believed that the Incas used anesthesia. Evidence supports the theory that shamans chewed cocoa leaves and drilled holes into the heads of patients (letting evil spirits escape), spitting into the wounds they made. The mixture of cocaine, saliva, and resin numbed the site enough to allow hours of drilling.

Did you know?

In most cases, kidneys can recover from almost complete loss of function, such as in acute kidney (renal) failure.

Did you know?

The first documented use of surgical anesthesia in the United States was in Connecticut in 1844.

Did you know?

The average person is easily confused by the terms pharmaceutics and pharmacology, thinking they are one and the same. Whereas pharmaceutics is the science of preparing and dispensing drugs (otherwise known as the science of pharmacy), pharmacology is the study of medications.

Did you know?

Excessive alcohol use costs the country approximately $235 billion every year.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library