This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Why is it so difficult to determine exactly what the effects of spanking are on an individual ... (Read 54 times)

JGIBBSON

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 538
Why is it so difficult to determine exactly what the effects of spanking are on an
  individual child?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Reframing the home-care worker relationship to the elderly from that of professional
  worker to fictive kin is harmful to both the worker and the elderly client.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

fffftttt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 322
Answer to Question 1

Data analysis is correlational, not directly causal. Many factors other than spanking enter
into the parent-child relationship. Some considerations are: genetic factors of both parent
and child, presence of sibs, unequal treatment in families, gender effects, cultural norm
effects, familial influence on parent and child, stress and crisis other than spanking,
severity, frequency, environmental conditions, intervening variables, methodologies are
complex, etc.

Answer to Question 2

T




JGIBBSON

  • Member
  • Posts: 538
Reply 2 on: Jun 18, 2018
Wow, this really help


bigsis44

  • Member
  • Posts: 317
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

The most common treatment options for addiction include psychotherapy, support groups, and individual counseling.

Did you know?

Calcitonin is a naturally occurring hormone. In women who are at least 5 years beyond menopause, it slows bone loss and increases spinal bone density.

Did you know?

Colchicine is a highly poisonous alkaloid originally extracted from a type of saffron plant that is used mainly to treat gout.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

Did you know?

People with high total cholesterol have about two times the risk for heart disease as people with ideal levels.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library