In U.S. v. Young, where government agents put Federal Express packages to Young under an x-ray to look at the contents, and he was convicted partly based on that evidence, the appeals court held that:
a. there was no need for a warrant because Young assumed the risk that Federal Express might consent to a search
b. there was a need for a warrant because Young assumed the risk that Federal Express might consent to a search
c. there was no need for a warrant because Young did not assume the risk that Federal Express might consent to a search
d. there was a need for a warrant because Young did not assume the risk that Federal Express might consent to a search
e. none of the other choice are correct
Question 2
Which of the following is likely to violate the due process clause:
a. laws that do not treat people equally
b. laws that shock the conscience of a court
c. laws that infringe on fundamental liberty interests d. b and c
e. a, b and c
Young male Pacific Walruses on Cape Pierce in Alaska. Note the variation in the curvature and orient
Charging young leopard
Chemical Warfare Agents and Treatments
Categories of Infectious Agents
Agents Used in the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus