In U.S. v. Young, where government agents put Federal Express ...

[mwit1967]

In U.S. v. Young, where government agents put Federal Express packages to Young under an x-ray to look at the contents, and he was convicted partly based on that evidence, the appeals court held that:
 a. there was no need for a warrant because Young assumed the risk that Federal Express might consent to a search
  b. there was a need for a warrant because Young assumed the risk that Federal Express might consent to a search
  c. there was no need for a warrant because Young did not assume the risk that Federal Express might consent to a search
  d. there was a need for a warrant because Young did not assume the risk that Federal Express might consent to a search
  e. none of the other choice are correct

Question 2

Which of the following is likely to violate the due process clause:
 a. laws that do not treat people equally
  b. laws that shock the conscience of a court
  c. laws that infringe on fundamental liberty interests d. b and c
  e. a, b and c

[jomama]

Answer to Question 1

a

Answer to Question 2

d

[mwit1967]

YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

[aliotak]

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it