In U.S. v. Young, where government agents put Federal Express packages to Young under an x-ray to look at the contents, and he was convicted partly based on that evidence, the appeals court held that:
a. there was no need for a warrant because Young assumed the risk that Federal Express might consent to a search
b. there was a need for a warrant because Young assumed the risk that Federal Express might consent to a search
c. there was no need for a warrant because Young did not assume the risk that Federal Express might consent to a search
d. there was a need for a warrant because Young did not assume the risk that Federal Express might consent to a search
e. none of the other choice are correct
Question 2
Which of the following is likely to violate the due process clause:
a. laws that do not treat people equally
b. laws that shock the conscience of a court
c. laws that infringe on fundamental liberty interests d. b and c
e. a, b and c
Horses too young to be ridden are trained to accept a halter, taught basic skills, manners, and beco
A young male Asiatic lion
Shope’s Model of Young Driver Crash Risks The model shows that many factors contribute to crash ris
Antifungal Agents: Mucocutaneous Candidiasis
Classification of Antihypertensive Agents