This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Extraneous variables in a research study are best: a. identified by the researcher. b. ... (Read 32 times)

j.rubin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
Extraneous variables in a research study are best:
 
  a. identified by the researcher.
  b. identified by the reviewer.
  c. included in the analysis.
  d. left out of the critique.

Question 2

Which of the following is true about critiquing the literature review?
 
  a. All studies connected with the topic should be presented.
  b. The literature review for a qualitative study is going to be much lengthier than for a quantitative one.
  c. The literature should be summarized and presented in chronological order.
  d. The researcher should gather all relevant literature and present it as it applies to the current study, noting agreements, disagreements, and gaps in the knowledge base.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

elyse44

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 319
Answer to Question 1

ANS: A
It is always best if the researcher has identified all extraneous variables and has accounted for them in the report.
Hopefully, the researcher has already pointed out the extraneous variables and has, in some way, handled them. If the reviewer is pointing them out, it means the study probably has serious flaws.
It is not always possible or desirable to include extraneous variables in the analysis of a study.
Extraneous variables should not be left out of the critique; all identifiable variables should be addressed.

Answer to Question 2

ANS: D
A well-written literature review contains the following: all relevant literature and present it as it applies to the current study, noting agreements, disagreements, and gaps in the knowledge base.
Only relevant, current literature should be presented.
The literature review for a qualitative study is shorter than a literature review for a quantitative study as it is typically the process not to do an extensive search before the study to create researcher bias.
There could be situations in which a chronological order might make sense; ordinarily the literature is presented grouped by variables or concepts in the study.




j.rubin

  • Member
  • Posts: 557
Reply 2 on: Jul 8, 2018
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review


amynguyen1221

  • Member
  • Posts: 355
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Gracias!

 

Did you know?

For about 100 years, scientists thought that peptic ulcers were caused by stress, spicy food, and alcohol. Later, researchers added stomach acid to the list of causes and began treating ulcers with antacids. Now it is known that peptic ulcers are predominantly caused by Helicobacter pylori, a spiral-shaped bacterium that normally exist in the stomach.

Did you know?

ACTH levels are normally highest in the early morning (between 6 and 8 A.M.) and lowest in the evening (between 6 and 11 P.M.). Therefore, a doctor who suspects abnormal levels looks for low ACTH in the morning and high ACTH in the evening.

Did you know?

Certain rare plants containing cyanide include apricot pits and a type of potato called cassava. Fortunately, only chronic or massive ingestion of any of these plants can lead to serious poisoning.

Did you know?

Multiple sclerosis is a condition wherein the body's nervous system is weakened by an autoimmune reaction that attacks the myelin sheaths of neurons.

Did you know?

Anti-aging claims should not ever be believed. There is no supplement, medication, or any other substance that has been proven to slow or stop the aging process.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library