This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Extraneous variables in a research study are best: a. identified by the researcher. b. ... (Read 33 times)

j.rubin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
Extraneous variables in a research study are best:
 
  a. identified by the researcher.
  b. identified by the reviewer.
  c. included in the analysis.
  d. left out of the critique.

Question 2

Which of the following is true about critiquing the literature review?
 
  a. All studies connected with the topic should be presented.
  b. The literature review for a qualitative study is going to be much lengthier than for a quantitative one.
  c. The literature should be summarized and presented in chronological order.
  d. The researcher should gather all relevant literature and present it as it applies to the current study, noting agreements, disagreements, and gaps in the knowledge base.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

elyse44

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 319
Answer to Question 1

ANS: A
It is always best if the researcher has identified all extraneous variables and has accounted for them in the report.
Hopefully, the researcher has already pointed out the extraneous variables and has, in some way, handled them. If the reviewer is pointing them out, it means the study probably has serious flaws.
It is not always possible or desirable to include extraneous variables in the analysis of a study.
Extraneous variables should not be left out of the critique; all identifiable variables should be addressed.

Answer to Question 2

ANS: D
A well-written literature review contains the following: all relevant literature and present it as it applies to the current study, noting agreements, disagreements, and gaps in the knowledge base.
Only relevant, current literature should be presented.
The literature review for a qualitative study is shorter than a literature review for a quantitative study as it is typically the process not to do an extensive search before the study to create researcher bias.
There could be situations in which a chronological order might make sense; ordinarily the literature is presented grouped by variables or concepts in the study.




j.rubin

  • Member
  • Posts: 557
Reply 2 on: Jul 8, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


bigcheese9

  • Member
  • Posts: 333
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Excellent

 

Did you know?

In most climates, 8 to 10 glasses of water per day is recommended for adults. The best indicator for adequate fluid intake is frequent, clear urination.

Did you know?

Studies show that systolic blood pressure can be significantly lowered by taking statins. In fact, the higher the patient's baseline blood pressure, the greater the effect of statins on his or her blood pressure.

Did you know?

Approximately 15–25% of recognized pregnancies end in miscarriage. However, many miscarriages often occur before a woman even knows she is pregnant.

Did you know?

Persons who overdose with cardiac glycosides have a better chance of overall survival if they can survive the first 24 hours after the overdose.

Did you know?

Individuals are never “cured” of addictions. Instead, they learn how to manage their disease to lead healthy, balanced lives.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library