This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Extraneous variables in a research study are best: a. identified by the researcher. b. ... (Read 81 times)

j.rubin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
Extraneous variables in a research study are best:
 
  a. identified by the researcher.
  b. identified by the reviewer.
  c. included in the analysis.
  d. left out of the critique.

Question 2

Which of the following is true about critiquing the literature review?
 
  a. All studies connected with the topic should be presented.
  b. The literature review for a qualitative study is going to be much lengthier than for a quantitative one.
  c. The literature should be summarized and presented in chronological order.
  d. The researcher should gather all relevant literature and present it as it applies to the current study, noting agreements, disagreements, and gaps in the knowledge base.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

elyse44

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 319
Answer to Question 1

ANS: A
It is always best if the researcher has identified all extraneous variables and has accounted for them in the report.
Hopefully, the researcher has already pointed out the extraneous variables and has, in some way, handled them. If the reviewer is pointing them out, it means the study probably has serious flaws.
It is not always possible or desirable to include extraneous variables in the analysis of a study.
Extraneous variables should not be left out of the critique; all identifiable variables should be addressed.

Answer to Question 2

ANS: D
A well-written literature review contains the following: all relevant literature and present it as it applies to the current study, noting agreements, disagreements, and gaps in the knowledge base.
Only relevant, current literature should be presented.
The literature review for a qualitative study is shorter than a literature review for a quantitative study as it is typically the process not to do an extensive search before the study to create researcher bias.
There could be situations in which a chronological order might make sense; ordinarily the literature is presented grouped by variables or concepts in the study.




j.rubin

  • Member
  • Posts: 557
Reply 2 on: Jul 8, 2018
:D TYSM


Liamb2179

  • Member
  • Posts: 365
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

 

Did you know?

In most cases, kidneys can recover from almost complete loss of function, such as in acute kidney (renal) failure.

Did you know?

The toxic levels for lithium carbonate are close to the therapeutic levels. Signs of toxicity include fine hand tremor, polyuria, mild thirst, nausea, general discomfort, diarrhea, vomiting, drowsiness, muscular weakness, lack of coordination, ataxia, giddiness, tinnitus, and blurred vision.

Did you know?

Your heart beats over 36 million times a year.

Did you know?

Essential fatty acids have been shown to be effective against ulcers, asthma, dental cavities, and skin disorders such as acne.

Did you know?

After a vasectomy, it takes about 12 ejaculations to clear out sperm that were already beyond the blocked area.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library