This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Extraneous variables in a research study are best: a. identified by the researcher. b. ... (Read 84 times)

j.rubin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
Extraneous variables in a research study are best:
 
  a. identified by the researcher.
  b. identified by the reviewer.
  c. included in the analysis.
  d. left out of the critique.

Question 2

Which of the following is true about critiquing the literature review?
 
  a. All studies connected with the topic should be presented.
  b. The literature review for a qualitative study is going to be much lengthier than for a quantitative one.
  c. The literature should be summarized and presented in chronological order.
  d. The researcher should gather all relevant literature and present it as it applies to the current study, noting agreements, disagreements, and gaps in the knowledge base.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

elyse44

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 319
Answer to Question 1

ANS: A
It is always best if the researcher has identified all extraneous variables and has accounted for them in the report.
Hopefully, the researcher has already pointed out the extraneous variables and has, in some way, handled them. If the reviewer is pointing them out, it means the study probably has serious flaws.
It is not always possible or desirable to include extraneous variables in the analysis of a study.
Extraneous variables should not be left out of the critique; all identifiable variables should be addressed.

Answer to Question 2

ANS: D
A well-written literature review contains the following: all relevant literature and present it as it applies to the current study, noting agreements, disagreements, and gaps in the knowledge base.
Only relevant, current literature should be presented.
The literature review for a qualitative study is shorter than a literature review for a quantitative study as it is typically the process not to do an extensive search before the study to create researcher bias.
There could be situations in which a chronological order might make sense; ordinarily the literature is presented grouped by variables or concepts in the study.




j.rubin

  • Member
  • Posts: 557
Reply 2 on: Jul 8, 2018
Gracias!


pratush dev

  • Member
  • Posts: 321
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

 

Did you know?

Complications of influenza include: bacterial pneumonia, ear and sinus infections, dehydration, and worsening of chronic conditions such as asthma, congestive heart failure, or diabetes.

Did you know?

Throughout history, plants containing cardiac steroids have been used as heart drugs and as poisons (e.g., in arrows used in combat), emetics, and diuretics.

Did you know?

Bacteria have flourished on the earth for over three billion years. They were the first life forms on the planet.

Did you know?

About 3.2 billion people, nearly half the world population, are at risk for malaria. In 2015, there are about 214 million malaria cases and an estimated 438,000 malaria deaths.

Did you know?

The Romans did not use numerals to indicate fractions but instead used words to indicate parts of a whole.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library