This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In the case of Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court ruled that A) improperly collected evidence ... (Read 41 times)

Jramos095

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 528
In the case of Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court ruled that
 
  A) improperly collected evidence cannot be introduced in court.
   B) the police must inform suspects of their rights.
   C) guidelines to protect jurors from biased news coverage must be established.
   D) indigent defendants are guaranteed legal counsel.
   E) defendants have the right to a speedy trial.

Question 2

The spoils system did not work well because it did not suit the needs of political parties.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

izzat

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 328
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

FALSE




Jramos095

  • Member
  • Posts: 528
Reply 2 on: Jul 9, 2018
Great answer, keep it coming :)


softEldritch

  • Member
  • Posts: 334
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Gracias!

 

Did you know?

The average older adult in the United States takes five prescription drugs per day. Half of these drugs contain a sedative. Alcohol should therefore be avoided by most senior citizens because of the dangerous interactions between alcohol and sedatives.

Did you know?

There are approximately 3 million unintended pregnancies in the United States each year.

Did you know?

About 600,000 particles of skin are shed every hour by each human. If you live to age 70 years, you have shed 105 pounds of dead skin.

Did you know?

The most common treatment options for addiction include psychotherapy, support groups, and individual counseling.

Did you know?

Essential fatty acids have been shown to be effective against ulcers, asthma, dental cavities, and skin disorders such as acne.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library