This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In the case of Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court ruled that A) improperly collected evidence ... (Read 82 times)

Jramos095

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 528
In the case of Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court ruled that
 
  A) improperly collected evidence cannot be introduced in court.
   B) the police must inform suspects of their rights.
   C) guidelines to protect jurors from biased news coverage must be established.
   D) indigent defendants are guaranteed legal counsel.
   E) defendants have the right to a speedy trial.

Question 2

The spoils system did not work well because it did not suit the needs of political parties.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

izzat

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 328
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

FALSE




Jramos095

  • Member
  • Posts: 528
Reply 2 on: Jul 9, 2018
Gracias!


debra928

  • Member
  • Posts: 342
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Excellent

 

Did you know?

Throughout history, plants containing cardiac steroids have been used as heart drugs and as poisons (e.g., in arrows used in combat), emetics, and diuretics.

Did you know?

Fungal nail infections account for up to 30% of all skin infections. They affect 5% of the general population—mostly people over the age of 70.

Did you know?

The most common childhood diseases include croup, chickenpox, ear infections, flu, pneumonia, ringworm, respiratory syncytial virus, scabies, head lice, and asthma.

Did you know?

The immune system needs 9.5 hours of sleep in total darkness to recharge completely.

Did you know?

About 3.2 billion people, nearly half the world population, are at risk for malaria. In 2015, there are about 214 million malaria cases and an estimated 438,000 malaria deaths.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library