This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In the case of Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court ruled that A) improperly collected evidence ... (Read 66 times)

Jramos095

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 528
In the case of Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court ruled that
 
  A) improperly collected evidence cannot be introduced in court.
   B) the police must inform suspects of their rights.
   C) guidelines to protect jurors from biased news coverage must be established.
   D) indigent defendants are guaranteed legal counsel.
   E) defendants have the right to a speedy trial.

Question 2

The spoils system did not work well because it did not suit the needs of political parties.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

izzat

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 328
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

FALSE




Jramos095

  • Member
  • Posts: 528
Reply 2 on: Jul 9, 2018
:D TYSM


lcapri7

  • Member
  • Posts: 350
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Gracias!

 

Did you know?

There are 60,000 miles of blood vessels in every adult human.

Did you know?

Parkinson's disease is both chronic and progressive. This means that it persists over a long period of time and that its symptoms grow worse over time.

Did you know?

Most women experience menopause in their 50s. However, in 1994, an Italian woman gave birth to a baby boy when she was 61 years old.

Did you know?

The training of an anesthesiologist typically requires four years of college, 4 years of medical school, 1 year of internship, and 3 years of residency.

Did you know?

More than 30% of American adults, and about 12% of children utilize health care approaches that were developed outside of conventional medicine.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library