This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In the case of Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court ruled that A) improperly collected evidence ... (Read 85 times)

Jramos095

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 528
In the case of Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court ruled that
 
  A) improperly collected evidence cannot be introduced in court.
   B) the police must inform suspects of their rights.
   C) guidelines to protect jurors from biased news coverage must be established.
   D) indigent defendants are guaranteed legal counsel.
   E) defendants have the right to a speedy trial.

Question 2

The spoils system did not work well because it did not suit the needs of political parties.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

izzat

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 328
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

FALSE




Jramos095

  • Member
  • Posts: 528
Reply 2 on: Jul 9, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


jackie

  • Member
  • Posts: 324
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
:D TYSM

 

Did you know?

Your chance of developing a kidney stone is 1 in 10. In recent years, approximately 3.7 million people in the United States were diagnosed with a kidney disease.

Did you know?

Less than one of every three adults with high LDL cholesterol has the condition under control. Only 48.1% with the condition are being treated for it.

Did you know?

Oliver Wendell Holmes is credited with introducing the words "anesthesia" and "anesthetic" into the English language in 1846.

Did you know?

Patients who have been on total parenteral nutrition for more than a few days may need to have foods gradually reintroduced to give the digestive tract time to start working again.

Did you know?

Bacteria have been found alive in a lake buried one half mile under ice in Antarctica.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library