Author Question: The case of Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire enunciated the A) balancing doctrine. B) clear and ... (Read 32 times)

ishan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 546
The case of Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire enunciated the
 
  A) balancing doctrine.
   B) clear and present danger doctrine.
   C) fighting words doctrine.
   D) prior restraint doctrine.
   E) separation of church and state doctrine.

Question 2

Government programs and regulations that directly affect those living with the country are called
 
  A) welfare policy. B) general policy. C) domestic policy. D) foreign policy. E) social policy.



gstein359

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 293
Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

C



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

More than 30% of American adults, and about 12% of children utilize health care approaches that were developed outside of conventional medicine.

Did you know?

Anesthesia awareness is a potentially disturbing adverse effect wherein patients who have been paralyzed with muscle relaxants may awaken. They may be aware of their surroundings but unable to communicate or move. Neurologic monitoring equipment that helps to more closely check the patient's anesthesia stages is now available to avoid the occurrence of anesthesia awareness.

Did you know?

Not getting enough sleep can greatly weaken the immune system. Lack of sleep makes you more likely to catch a cold, or more difficult to fight off an infection.

Did you know?

Most fungi that pathogenically affect humans live in soil. If a person is not healthy, has an open wound, or is immunocompromised, a fungal infection can be very aggressive.

Did you know?

Children of people with alcoholism are more inclined to drink alcohol or use hard drugs. In fact, they are 400 times more likely to use hard drugs than those who do not have a family history of alcohol addiction.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library