Author Question: The case of Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire enunciated the A) balancing doctrine. B) clear and ... (Read 35 times)

ishan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 546
The case of Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire enunciated the
 
  A) balancing doctrine.
   B) clear and present danger doctrine.
   C) fighting words doctrine.
   D) prior restraint doctrine.
   E) separation of church and state doctrine.

Question 2

Government programs and regulations that directly affect those living with the country are called
 
  A) welfare policy. B) general policy. C) domestic policy. D) foreign policy. E) social policy.



gstein359

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 293
Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

C



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Although not all of the following muscle groups are commonly used, intramuscular injections may be given into the abdominals, biceps, calves, deltoids, gluteals, laterals, pectorals, quadriceps, trapezoids, and triceps.

Did you know?

Although puberty usually occurs in the early teenage years, the world's youngest parents were two Chinese children who had their first baby when they were 8 and 9 years of age.

Did you know?

In most climates, 8 to 10 glasses of water per day is recommended for adults. The best indicator for adequate fluid intake is frequent, clear urination.

Did you know?

Thyroid conditions may make getting pregnant impossible.

Did you know?

Though “Krazy Glue” or “Super Glue” has the ability to seal small wounds, it is not recommended for this purpose since it contains many substances that should not enter the body through the skin, and may be harmful.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library