Author Question: The case of Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire enunciated the A) balancing doctrine. B) clear and ... (Read 47 times)

ishan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 546
The case of Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire enunciated the
 
  A) balancing doctrine.
   B) clear and present danger doctrine.
   C) fighting words doctrine.
   D) prior restraint doctrine.
   E) separation of church and state doctrine.

Question 2

Government programs and regulations that directly affect those living with the country are called
 
  A) welfare policy. B) general policy. C) domestic policy. D) foreign policy. E) social policy.



gstein359

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 293
Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

C



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

More than 20 million Americans cite use of marijuana within the past 30 days, according to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). More than 8 million admit to using it almost every day.

Did you know?

It is believed that humans initially contracted crabs from gorillas about 3 million years ago from either sleeping in gorilla nests or eating the apes.

Did you know?

You should not take more than 1,000 mg of vitamin E per day. Doses above this amount increase the risk of bleeding problems that can lead to a stroke.

Did you know?

Certain topical medications such as clotrimazole and betamethasone are not approved for use in children younger than 12 years of age. They must be used very cautiously, as directed by a doctor, to treat any child. Children have a much greater response to topical steroid medications.

Did you know?

There are 60,000 miles of blood vessels in every adult human.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library