Author Question: The case of Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire enunciated the A) balancing doctrine. B) clear and ... (Read 12 times)

ishan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 546
The case of Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire enunciated the
 
  A) balancing doctrine.
   B) clear and present danger doctrine.
   C) fighting words doctrine.
   D) prior restraint doctrine.
   E) separation of church and state doctrine.

Question 2

Government programs and regulations that directly affect those living with the country are called
 
  A) welfare policy. B) general policy. C) domestic policy. D) foreign policy. E) social policy.



gstein359

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 293
Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

C



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Anesthesia awareness is a potentially disturbing adverse effect wherein patients who have been paralyzed with muscle relaxants may awaken. They may be aware of their surroundings but unable to communicate or move. Neurologic monitoring equipment that helps to more closely check the patient's anesthesia stages is now available to avoid the occurrence of anesthesia awareness.

Did you know?

Addicts to opiates often avoid treatment because they are afraid of withdrawal. Though unpleasant, with proper management, withdrawal is rarely fatal and passes relatively quickly.

Did you know?

Fewer than 10% of babies are born on their exact due dates, 50% are born within 1 week of the due date, and 90% are born within 2 weeks of the date.

Did you know?

In 1886, William Bates reported on the discovery of a substance produced by the adrenal gland that turned out to be epinephrine (adrenaline). In 1904, this drug was first artificially synthesized by Friedrich Stolz.

Did you know?

More than 150,000 Americans killed by cardiovascular disease are younger than the age of 65 years.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library