This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Discuss two basic philosophies of pest control. How effective are they? What will be an ideal ... (Read 32 times)

jasdeep_brar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 569
Discuss two basic philosophies of pest control. How effective are they?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Cite some reasons for the existence of controversies within science, and carefully distinguish between sound science and junk science.
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

nikmaaacs

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 335
Answer to Question 1

One method looks for a magic bullet that will eradicate or greatly lessen the numbers of the pest organism. This philosophy relies on chemical control of pest populations. The other major method used to control agricultural pests is ecological pest management. This method focuses on the pest's life cycle and its ecological relationships. Building soil and maintaining a diverse ecosystem are integral to this technique. Ecological pest management uses agents that are highly specific for the pest species being fought, or they manipulate one or more aspects of the ecosystem.
Integrated pest management begins with sustainable ecosystem management but, as a last resort, will use chemical pest management techniques. A farmer who has not used ecosystem-sustaining farming methods has not practiced ecological pest management or integrated pest management, even if he/she has not used pesticides during a growing season.

Answer to Question 2

There are at least four reasons for controversies in science. First, we are continually confronted by new observation . . . and it takes some time before all the hypotheses regarding the cause of what we have observed can be adequately tested. During this time, there may be honest disagreement as to which hypothesis is most likely. Such controversies are gradually settled by further observations and testing. . . . Second, we are looking at complex phenomena that do not lend themselves to simple tests of experiments. . . . Gradually, different lines of evidence come to support one hypothesis and exclude another, enabling the issue to be resolved. Third, there are many vested interests which wish to maintain and promote disagreement because they stand to profit by doing so. Last, subjective value judgments may be involved.
Sound science has the scientific method behind it. Assumptions and hypotheses have been tested over and over and over, and papers have been reviewed by peers before being published. Historic sciences such as astronomy and geology have many careful observations and measurements that are repeated over and over. Junk science does not conform to the rigors of science. It picks only the observations or results that prove its point. The material may be published but not in recognized peer-reviewed journals.




jasdeep_brar

  • Member
  • Posts: 569
Reply 2 on: Jul 15, 2018
Gracias!


brbarasa

  • Member
  • Posts: 308
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

 

Did you know?

Parkinson's disease is both chronic and progressive. This means that it persists over a long period of time and that its symptoms grow worse over time.

Did you know?

Many medications that are used to treat infertility are injected subcutaneously. This is easy to do using the anterior abdomen as the site of injection but avoiding the area directly around the belly button.

Did you know?

Between 1999 and 2012, American adults with high total cholesterol decreased from 18.3% to 12.9%

Did you know?

People about to have surgery must tell their health care providers about all supplements they take.

Did you know?

According to the FDA, adverse drug events harmed or killed approximately 1,200,000 people in the United States in the year 2015.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library