This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Discuss two basic philosophies of pest control. How effective are they? What will be an ideal ... (Read 69 times)

jasdeep_brar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 569
Discuss two basic philosophies of pest control. How effective are they?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Cite some reasons for the existence of controversies within science, and carefully distinguish between sound science and junk science.
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

nikmaaacs

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 335
Answer to Question 1

One method looks for a magic bullet that will eradicate or greatly lessen the numbers of the pest organism. This philosophy relies on chemical control of pest populations. The other major method used to control agricultural pests is ecological pest management. This method focuses on the pest's life cycle and its ecological relationships. Building soil and maintaining a diverse ecosystem are integral to this technique. Ecological pest management uses agents that are highly specific for the pest species being fought, or they manipulate one or more aspects of the ecosystem.
Integrated pest management begins with sustainable ecosystem management but, as a last resort, will use chemical pest management techniques. A farmer who has not used ecosystem-sustaining farming methods has not practiced ecological pest management or integrated pest management, even if he/she has not used pesticides during a growing season.

Answer to Question 2

There are at least four reasons for controversies in science. First, we are continually confronted by new observation . . . and it takes some time before all the hypotheses regarding the cause of what we have observed can be adequately tested. During this time, there may be honest disagreement as to which hypothesis is most likely. Such controversies are gradually settled by further observations and testing. . . . Second, we are looking at complex phenomena that do not lend themselves to simple tests of experiments. . . . Gradually, different lines of evidence come to support one hypothesis and exclude another, enabling the issue to be resolved. Third, there are many vested interests which wish to maintain and promote disagreement because they stand to profit by doing so. Last, subjective value judgments may be involved.
Sound science has the scientific method behind it. Assumptions and hypotheses have been tested over and over and over, and papers have been reviewed by peers before being published. Historic sciences such as astronomy and geology have many careful observations and measurements that are repeated over and over. Junk science does not conform to the rigors of science. It picks only the observations or results that prove its point. The material may be published but not in recognized peer-reviewed journals.




jasdeep_brar

  • Member
  • Posts: 569
Reply 2 on: Jul 15, 2018
Wow, this really help


bigsis44

  • Member
  • Posts: 317
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Excellent

 

Did you know?

As of mid-2016, 18.2 million people were receiving advanced retroviral therapy (ART) worldwide. This represents between 43–50% of the 34–39.8 million people living with HIV.

Did you know?

The eye muscles are the most active muscles in the whole body. The external muscles that move the eyes are the strongest muscles in the human body for the job they have to do. They are 100 times more powerful than they need to be.

Did you know?

The toxic levels for lithium carbonate are close to the therapeutic levels. Signs of toxicity include fine hand tremor, polyuria, mild thirst, nausea, general discomfort, diarrhea, vomiting, drowsiness, muscular weakness, lack of coordination, ataxia, giddiness, tinnitus, and blurred vision.

Did you know?

About 600,000 particles of skin are shed every hour by each human. If you live to age 70 years, you have shed 105 pounds of dead skin.

Did you know?

The largest baby ever born weighed more than 23 pounds but died just 11 hours after his birth in 1879. The largest surviving baby was born in October 2009 in Sumatra, Indonesia, and weighed an astounding 19.2 pounds at birth.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library