This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Paralegal Cheri worked on the defense of Client Joe Thames. As part of that matter, Cheri worked on ... (Read 82 times)

chandani

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 541
Paralegal Cheri worked on the defense of Client Joe Thames. As part of that matter, Cheri worked on restructuring Joe's finances, creating trust funds for his children, and moving some of his money to off-shore accounts. When Cheri moved to the Gnew Law Firm, she participated in Gnew's standard conflict check and discovered no potential conflicts. Some months later, Gnew took on a new collection matter from Bank of West Virginia: Bank v. Joe Thames. Cheri has not been assigned to the case and, in fact, doesn't even work on the same floor as the collection team at Gnew. What is Cheri's obligation?
 
  A) Cheri can but does not have to say anything about the conflict so long as she does not divulge any confidential information about Joe.
  B) Cheri should quit her job at Gnew before the whole firm is disqualified from the case.
  C) Cheri must bring this information to her supervising lawyer even though she is not working on the case because the law assumes that she will divulge confidential information that is adverse to her former client.
  D) Cheri should not say anything about the conflict because she was not assigned to the case.

Question 2

While at Scott & French, Paralegal Nancy worked as part of the litigation team representing the plaintiff in Big Corp vs. Little Corp When Nancy leaves Scott & French to accept a job with William & Marks, she learns that her new employer is contemplating representing Big Corp in a merger with Medium Corp Nancy
 
  A) probably has a conflict of interest if William & Marks takes on the representation AND if the firm assigns Nancy to that matter.
  B) probably has a conflict of interest due to her representation of Big Corp. while at Scott & French.
  C) probably does not have a conflict of interest because the new representation does not appear to be materially adverse to the former representation.
  D) probably does not have a conflict of interest because the new matter is not litigation.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Jadwiga9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 316
Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

C




chandani

  • Member
  • Posts: 541
Reply 2 on: Aug 3, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


shailee

  • Member
  • Posts: 392
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Wow, this really help

 

Did you know?

Ether was used widely for surgeries but became less popular because of its flammability and its tendency to cause vomiting. In England, it was quickly replaced by chloroform, but this agent caused many deaths and lost popularity.

Did you know?

Street names for barbiturates include reds, red devils, yellow jackets, blue heavens, Christmas trees, and rainbows. They are commonly referred to as downers.

Did you know?

Human neurons are so small that they require a microscope in order to be seen. However, some neurons can be up to 3 feet long, such as those that extend from the spinal cord to the toes.

Did you know?

Malaria was not eliminated in the United States until 1951. The term eliminated means that no new cases arise in a country for 3 years.

Did you know?

The most destructive flu epidemic of all times in recorded history occurred in 1918, with approximately 20 million deaths worldwide.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library