This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Paralegal Cheri worked on the defense of Client Joe Thames. As part of that matter, Cheri worked on ... (Read 81 times)

chandani

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 541
Paralegal Cheri worked on the defense of Client Joe Thames. As part of that matter, Cheri worked on restructuring Joe's finances, creating trust funds for his children, and moving some of his money to off-shore accounts. When Cheri moved to the Gnew Law Firm, she participated in Gnew's standard conflict check and discovered no potential conflicts. Some months later, Gnew took on a new collection matter from Bank of West Virginia: Bank v. Joe Thames. Cheri has not been assigned to the case and, in fact, doesn't even work on the same floor as the collection team at Gnew. What is Cheri's obligation?
 
  A) Cheri can but does not have to say anything about the conflict so long as she does not divulge any confidential information about Joe.
  B) Cheri should quit her job at Gnew before the whole firm is disqualified from the case.
  C) Cheri must bring this information to her supervising lawyer even though she is not working on the case because the law assumes that she will divulge confidential information that is adverse to her former client.
  D) Cheri should not say anything about the conflict because she was not assigned to the case.

Question 2

While at Scott & French, Paralegal Nancy worked as part of the litigation team representing the plaintiff in Big Corp vs. Little Corp When Nancy leaves Scott & French to accept a job with William & Marks, she learns that her new employer is contemplating representing Big Corp in a merger with Medium Corp Nancy
 
  A) probably has a conflict of interest if William & Marks takes on the representation AND if the firm assigns Nancy to that matter.
  B) probably has a conflict of interest due to her representation of Big Corp. while at Scott & French.
  C) probably does not have a conflict of interest because the new representation does not appear to be materially adverse to the former representation.
  D) probably does not have a conflict of interest because the new matter is not litigation.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Jadwiga9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 316
Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

C




chandani

  • Member
  • Posts: 541
Reply 2 on: Aug 3, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


meow1234

  • Member
  • Posts: 333
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Gracias!

 

Did you know?

Vaccines cause herd immunity. If the majority of people in a community have been vaccinated against a disease, an unvaccinated person is less likely to get the disease since others are less likely to become sick from it and spread the disease.

Did you know?

Throughout history, plants containing cardiac steroids have been used as heart drugs and as poisons (e.g., in arrows used in combat), emetics, and diuretics.

Did you know?

Before a vaccine is licensed in the USA, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviews it for safety and effectiveness. The CDC then reviews all studies again, as well as the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Physicians. Every lot of vaccine is tested before administration to the public, and the FDA regularly inspects vaccine manufacturers' facilities.

Did you know?

Nearly 31 million adults in America have a total cholesterol level that is more than 240 mg per dL.

Did you know?

The first monoclonal antibodies were made exclusively from mouse cells. Some are now fully human, which means they are likely to be safer and may be more effective than older monoclonal antibodies.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library