This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Paralegal Cheri worked on the defense of Client Joe Thames. As part of that matter, Cheri worked on ... (Read 105 times)

chandani

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 541
Paralegal Cheri worked on the defense of Client Joe Thames. As part of that matter, Cheri worked on restructuring Joe's finances, creating trust funds for his children, and moving some of his money to off-shore accounts. When Cheri moved to the Gnew Law Firm, she participated in Gnew's standard conflict check and discovered no potential conflicts. Some months later, Gnew took on a new collection matter from Bank of West Virginia: Bank v. Joe Thames. Cheri has not been assigned to the case and, in fact, doesn't even work on the same floor as the collection team at Gnew. What is Cheri's obligation?
 
  A) Cheri can but does not have to say anything about the conflict so long as she does not divulge any confidential information about Joe.
  B) Cheri should quit her job at Gnew before the whole firm is disqualified from the case.
  C) Cheri must bring this information to her supervising lawyer even though she is not working on the case because the law assumes that she will divulge confidential information that is adverse to her former client.
  D) Cheri should not say anything about the conflict because she was not assigned to the case.

Question 2

While at Scott & French, Paralegal Nancy worked as part of the litigation team representing the plaintiff in Big Corp vs. Little Corp When Nancy leaves Scott & French to accept a job with William & Marks, she learns that her new employer is contemplating representing Big Corp in a merger with Medium Corp Nancy
 
  A) probably has a conflict of interest if William & Marks takes on the representation AND if the firm assigns Nancy to that matter.
  B) probably has a conflict of interest due to her representation of Big Corp. while at Scott & French.
  C) probably does not have a conflict of interest because the new representation does not appear to be materially adverse to the former representation.
  D) probably does not have a conflict of interest because the new matter is not litigation.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Jadwiga9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 316
Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

C




chandani

  • Member
  • Posts: 541
Reply 2 on: Aug 3, 2018
Gracias!


nanny

  • Member
  • Posts: 313
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

The toxic levels for lithium carbonate are close to the therapeutic levels. Signs of toxicity include fine hand tremor, polyuria, mild thirst, nausea, general discomfort, diarrhea, vomiting, drowsiness, muscular weakness, lack of coordination, ataxia, giddiness, tinnitus, and blurred vision.

Did you know?

It is believed that humans initially contracted crabs from gorillas about 3 million years ago from either sleeping in gorilla nests or eating the apes.

Did you know?

Amphetamine poisoning can cause intravascular coagulation, circulatory collapse, rhabdomyolysis, ischemic colitis, acute psychosis, hyperthermia, respiratory distress syndrome, and pericarditis.

Did you know?

Nearly 31 million adults in America have a total cholesterol level that is more than 240 mg per dL.

Did you know?

The eye muscles are the most active muscles in the whole body. The external muscles that move the eyes are the strongest muscles in the human body for the job they have to do. They are 100 times more powerful than they need to be.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library