Author Question: Why is a live court reporter better than an electronic recorder? What will be an ideal ... (Read 53 times)

sc00by25

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 596
Why is a live court reporter better than an electronic recorder?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

What would happen if a court reporter were not accurate?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



flexer1n1

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 373
Answer to Question 1

Because a live court reporter can more accurately detect what is being said and what is being recorded, where an electronic recorder may malfunction or pick up extraneous noises. Students may also give their own individual responses to this question.

Answer to Question 2

The integrity of the record as well as the profession would be in jeopardy. Transcripts could not be trusted as to their reliability.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Warfarin was developed as a consequence of the study of a strange bleeding disorder that suddenly occurred in cattle on the northern prairies of the United States in the early 1900s.

Did you know?

Vaccines prevent between 2.5 and 4 million deaths every year.

Did you know?

It is believed that humans initially contracted crabs from gorillas about 3 million years ago from either sleeping in gorilla nests or eating the apes.

Did you know?

Calcitonin is a naturally occurring hormone. In women who are at least 5 years beyond menopause, it slows bone loss and increases spinal bone density.

Did you know?

Acute bronchitis is an inflammation of the breathing tubes (bronchi), which causes increased mucus production and other changes. It is usually caused by bacteria or viruses, can be serious in people who have pulmonary or cardiac diseases, and can lead to pneumonia.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library