Author Question: Why is a live court reporter better than an electronic recorder? What will be an ideal ... (Read 58 times)

sc00by25

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 596
Why is a live court reporter better than an electronic recorder?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

What would happen if a court reporter were not accurate?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



flexer1n1

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 373
Answer to Question 1

Because a live court reporter can more accurately detect what is being said and what is being recorded, where an electronic recorder may malfunction or pick up extraneous noises. Students may also give their own individual responses to this question.

Answer to Question 2

The integrity of the record as well as the profession would be in jeopardy. Transcripts could not be trusted as to their reliability.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

The largest baby ever born weighed more than 23 pounds but died just 11 hours after his birth in 1879. The largest surviving baby was born in October 2009 in Sumatra, Indonesia, and weighed an astounding 19.2 pounds at birth.

Did you know?

Aspirin is the most widely used drug in the world. It has even been recognized as such by the Guinness Book of World Records.

Did you know?

Alcohol acts as a diuretic. Eight ounces of water is needed to metabolize just 1 ounce of alcohol.

Did you know?

According to the Migraine Research Foundation, migraines are the third most prevalent illness in the world. Women are most affected (18%), followed by children of both sexes (10%), and men (6%).

Did you know?

Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness. As of yet, there is no cure. Everyone is at risk, and there may be no warning signs. It is six to eight times more common in African Americans than in whites. The best and most effective way to detect glaucoma is to receive a dilated eye examination.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library