Author Question: Why is a live court reporter better than an electronic recorder? What will be an ideal ... (Read 30 times)

sc00by25

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 596
Why is a live court reporter better than an electronic recorder?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

What would happen if a court reporter were not accurate?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



flexer1n1

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 373
Answer to Question 1

Because a live court reporter can more accurately detect what is being said and what is being recorded, where an electronic recorder may malfunction or pick up extraneous noises. Students may also give their own individual responses to this question.

Answer to Question 2

The integrity of the record as well as the profession would be in jeopardy. Transcripts could not be trusted as to their reliability.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Aspirin may benefit 11 different cancers, including those of the colon, pancreas, lungs, prostate, breasts, and leukemia.

Did you know?

Human kidneys will clean about 1 million gallons of blood in an average lifetime.

Did you know?

Allergies play a major part in the health of children. The most prevalent childhood allergies are milk, egg, soy, wheat, peanuts, tree nuts, and seafood.

Did you know?

There are more sensory neurons in the tongue than in any other part of the body.

Did you know?

Most strokes are caused when blood clots move to a blood vessel in the brain and block blood flow to that area. Thrombolytic therapy can be used to dissolve the clot quickly. If given within 3 hours of the first stroke symptoms, this therapy can help limit stroke damage and disability.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library