Author Question: Why is a live court reporter better than an electronic recorder? What will be an ideal ... (Read 61 times)

sc00by25

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 596
Why is a live court reporter better than an electronic recorder?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

What would happen if a court reporter were not accurate?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



flexer1n1

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 373
Answer to Question 1

Because a live court reporter can more accurately detect what is being said and what is being recorded, where an electronic recorder may malfunction or pick up extraneous noises. Students may also give their own individual responses to this question.

Answer to Question 2

The integrity of the record as well as the profession would be in jeopardy. Transcripts could not be trusted as to their reliability.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

A seasonal flu vaccine is the best way to reduce the chances you will get seasonal influenza and spread it to others.

Did you know?

Multiple experimental evidences have confirmed that at the molecular level, cancer is caused by lesions in cellular DNA.

Did you know?

Studies show that systolic blood pressure can be significantly lowered by taking statins. In fact, the higher the patient's baseline blood pressure, the greater the effect of statins on his or her blood pressure.

Did you know?

Nearly 31 million adults in America have a total cholesterol level that is more than 240 mg per dL.

Did you know?

Though newer “smart” infusion pumps are increasingly becoming more sophisticated, they cannot prevent all programming and administration errors. Health care professionals that use smart infusion pumps must still practice the rights of medication administration and have other professionals double-check all high-risk infusions.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library