In Kyllo v. United States (2001), the Court held that using a technological device to explore the details of a home that would previously have been unknowable without physical intrusion is a search and is presumptively unreasonable without:
a. reasonable suspicion.
b. a probable cause.
c. a warrant.
d. exigent circumstances.
Question 2
In Florida v. Riley (1989), the Court said that aerial observation is valid as long as the police are flying:
a. at an altitude at which Federal Aviation Administration regulations allow members of the public to fly.
b. at an altitude above which Federal Aviation Administration regulations allow members of the public to fly.
c. at an altitude below which Federal Aviation Administration regulations allow members of the public to fly.
d. private aircraft.
Touchscreen device
The United States in the Caribbean and Central America
Occupational Prestige: How The United States Compares With Sixty Countries
For millions of people, the United States represents a land of opportunity and freedom from ...
Weight management is such a hot topic in the United States that it is frequently