In Kyllo v. United States (2001), the Court held that using a technological device to explore the details of a home that would previously have been unknowable without physical intrusion is a search and is presumptively unreasonable without:
a. reasonable suspicion.
b. a probable cause.
c. a warrant.
d. exigent circumstances.
Question 2
In Florida v. Riley (1989), the Court said that aerial observation is valid as long as the police are flying:
a. at an altitude at which Federal Aviation Administration regulations allow members of the public to fly.
b. at an altitude above which Federal Aviation Administration regulations allow members of the public to fly.
c. at an altitude below which Federal Aviation Administration regulations allow members of the public to fly.
d. private aircraft.
These young children are taking the initiative to explore their environment as they examine a snail
Pulse oximetry. The small device provides a digital readout of oxygen levels in the blood.
Median Age at First Marriage in the United States
Cohabitation in the United States
An example of the sometimes drastic differences in placarding regulations in the United States ...