Author Question: In Kyllo v. United States (2001), the Court held that using a technological device to explore the ... (Read 58 times)

mia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 564
In Kyllo v. United States (2001), the Court held that using a technological device to explore the details of a home that would previously have been unknowable without physical intrusion is a search and is presumptively unreasonable without:
 
  a. reasonable suspicion.
  b. a probable cause.
  c. a warrant.
  d. exigent circumstances.

Question 2

In Florida v. Riley (1989), the Court said that aerial observation is valid as long as the police are flying:
 
  a. at an altitude at which Federal Aviation Administration regulations allow members of the public to fly.
  b. at an altitude above which Federal Aviation Administration regulations allow members of the public to fly.
  c. at an altitude below which Federal Aviation Administration regulations allow members of the public to fly.
  d. private aircraft.



matt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 344
Answer to Question 1

c

Answer to Question 2

a



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Certain topical medications such as clotrimazole and betamethasone are not approved for use in children younger than 12 years of age. They must be used very cautiously, as directed by a doctor, to treat any child. Children have a much greater response to topical steroid medications.

Did you know?

In 1864, the first barbiturate (barbituric acid) was synthesized.

Did you know?

Cyanide works by making the human body unable to use oxygen.

Did you know?

Amoebae are the simplest type of protozoans, and are characterized by a feeding and dividing trophozoite stage that moves by temporary extensions called pseudopodia or false feet.

Did you know?

After a vasectomy, it takes about 12 ejaculations to clear out sperm that were already beyond the blocked area.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library