In Kyllo v. United States (2001), the Court held that using a technological device to explore the details of a home that would previously have been unknowable without physical intrusion is a search and is presumptively unreasonable without:
a. reasonable suspicion.
b. a probable cause.
c. a warrant.
d. exigent circumstances.
Question 2
In Florida v. Riley (1989), the Court said that aerial observation is valid as long as the police are flying:
a. at an altitude at which Federal Aviation Administration regulations allow members of the public to fly.
b. at an altitude above which Federal Aviation Administration regulations allow members of the public to fly.
c. at an altitude below which Federal Aviation Administration regulations allow members of the public to fly.
d. private aircraft.
Two-Point Threshold Device for Measuring Touch Acuity
Countries of Origin of Unauthorized Immigrants to the United States
Percent of Selected Foods and Beverages Consumed in the United States
Income Distribution in the United States, 2009
Handheld BIA device