In Kyllo v. United States (2001), the Court held that using a ...

[mia]

In Kyllo v. United States (2001), the Court held that using a technological device to explore the details of a home that would previously have been unknowable without physical intrusion is a search and is presumptively unreasonable without:
 
  a. reasonable suspicion.
  b. a probable cause.
  c. a warrant.
  d. exigent circumstances.

Question 2

In Florida v. Riley (1989), the Court said that aerial observation is valid as long as the police are flying:
 
  a. at an altitude at which Federal Aviation Administration regulations allow members of the public to fly.
  b. at an altitude above which Federal Aviation Administration regulations allow members of the public to fly.
  c. at an altitude below which Federal Aviation Administration regulations allow members of the public to fly.
  d. private aircraft.

[matt]

Answer to Question 1

c

Answer to Question 2

a