Author Question: After Weeks v. United States, what would have been the result in federal court? a. All the ... (Read 51 times)

Tazate

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 532
After Weeks v. United States, what would have been the result in federal court?
 
  a. All the evidence would have been admissible
  b. Only the printing presses would have been admissible
  c. None of the evidence would have been admissible
  d. Only the printing plates would have been admissible

Question 2

Prior to Weeks v. United States, what would have been the result in federal court?
 
  a. All the evidence would have been admissible
  b. Only the printing presses would have been admissible
  c. None of the evidence would have been admissible
  d. Only the printing plates would have been admissible



zogaridan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 328
Answer to Question 1

c

Answer to Question 2

a



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

Cancer has been around as long as humankind, but only in the second half of the twentieth century did the number of cancer cases explode.

Did you know?

As of mid-2016, 18.2 million people were receiving advanced retroviral therapy (ART) worldwide. This represents between 43–50% of the 34–39.8 million people living with HIV.

Did you know?

A seasonal flu vaccine is the best way to reduce the chances you will get seasonal influenza and spread it to others.

Did you know?

Since 1988, the CDC has reported a 99% reduction in bacterial meningitis caused by Haemophilus influenzae, due to the introduction of the vaccine against it.

Did you know?

To combat osteoporosis, changes in lifestyle and diet are recommended. At-risk patients should include 1,200 to 1,500 mg of calcium daily either via dietary means or with supplements.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library