Author Question: After Weeks v. United States, what would have been the result in federal court? a. All the ... (Read 17 times)

Tazate

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 532
After Weeks v. United States, what would have been the result in federal court?
 
  a. All the evidence would have been admissible
  b. Only the printing presses would have been admissible
  c. None of the evidence would have been admissible
  d. Only the printing plates would have been admissible

Question 2

Prior to Weeks v. United States, what would have been the result in federal court?
 
  a. All the evidence would have been admissible
  b. Only the printing presses would have been admissible
  c. None of the evidence would have been admissible
  d. Only the printing plates would have been admissible



zogaridan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 328
Answer to Question 1

c

Answer to Question 2

a



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

Earwax has antimicrobial properties that reduce the viability of bacteria and fungus in the human ear.

Did you know?

Bacteria have been found alive in a lake buried one half mile under ice in Antarctica.

Did you know?

By definition, when a medication is administered intravenously, its bioavailability is 100%.

Did you know?

Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness. As of yet, there is no cure. Everyone is at risk, and there may be no warning signs. It is six to eight times more common in African Americans than in whites. The best and most effective way to detect glaucoma is to receive a dilated eye examination.

Did you know?

Disorders that may affect pharmacodynamics include genetic mutations, malnutrition, thyrotoxicosis, myasthenia gravis, Parkinson's disease, and certain forms of insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library