Author Question: After Weeks v. United States, what would have been the result in federal court? a. All the ... (Read 56 times)

Tazate

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 532
After Weeks v. United States, what would have been the result in federal court?
 
  a. All the evidence would have been admissible
  b. Only the printing presses would have been admissible
  c. None of the evidence would have been admissible
  d. Only the printing plates would have been admissible

Question 2

Prior to Weeks v. United States, what would have been the result in federal court?
 
  a. All the evidence would have been admissible
  b. Only the printing presses would have been admissible
  c. None of the evidence would have been admissible
  d. Only the printing plates would have been admissible



zogaridan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 328
Answer to Question 1

c

Answer to Question 2

a



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

Serum cholesterol testing in adults is recommended every 1 to 5 years. People with diabetes and a family history of high cholesterol should be tested even more frequently.

Did you know?

The eye muscles are the most active muscles in the whole body. The external muscles that move the eyes are the strongest muscles in the human body for the job they have to do. They are 100 times more powerful than they need to be.

Did you know?

Each year in the United States, there are approximately six million pregnancies. This means that at any one time, about 4% of women in the United States are pregnant.

Did you know?

Women are 50% to 75% more likely than men to experience an adverse drug reaction.

Did you know?

In 1886, William Bates reported on the discovery of a substance produced by the adrenal gland that turned out to be epinephrine (adrenaline). In 1904, this drug was first artificially synthesized by Friedrich Stolz.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library