In Mapp v. Ohio (1961) the court articulated: a. the right of ...

[daltonest1984]

In Mapp v. Ohio (1961) the court articulated:
 
  a. the right of self-incrimination.
  b. the exclusionary rule applied to state searches and seizures.
  c. the right to assistance of counsel.
  d. the right to a speedy trial.

Question 2

The presumption of regularity posits that:
 
  a. most people who claim a violation of the equal protection clause have been discriminated against.
  b. most people who allege due process violations have been harmed.
  c. there is a set of due process requirements that apply in regular criminal cases.
  d. government actions are presumed lawful unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.

[prumorgan]

Answer to Question 1

b

Answer to Question 2

d

[daltonest1984]

Gracias!

[raili21]

Excellent