This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In Mapp v. Ohio (1961) the court articulated: a. the right of self-incrimination. b. the ... (Read 97 times)

daltonest1984

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 536
In Mapp v. Ohio (1961) the court articulated:
 
  a. the right of self-incrimination.
  b. the exclusionary rule applied to state searches and seizures.
  c. the right to assistance of counsel.
  d. the right to a speedy trial.

Question 2

The presumption of regularity posits that:
 
  a. most people who claim a violation of the equal protection clause have been discriminated against.
  b. most people who allege due process violations have been harmed.
  c. there is a set of due process requirements that apply in regular criminal cases.
  d. government actions are presumed lawful unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

prumorgan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 326
Answer to Question 1

b

Answer to Question 2

d




daltonest1984

  • Member
  • Posts: 536
Reply 2 on: Aug 16, 2018
Great answer, keep it coming :)


ricroger

  • Member
  • Posts: 352
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Excellent

 

Did you know?

Vaccines prevent between 2.5 and 4 million deaths every year.

Did you know?

The most common childhood diseases include croup, chickenpox, ear infections, flu, pneumonia, ringworm, respiratory syncytial virus, scabies, head lice, and asthma.

Did you know?

The FDA recognizes 118 routes of administration.

Did you know?

In ancient Rome, many of the richer people in the population had lead-induced gout. The reason for this is unclear. Lead poisoning has also been linked to madness.

Did you know?

Multiple experimental evidences have confirmed that at the molecular level, cancer is caused by lesions in cellular DNA.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library